Prediction of Astra Sharma [202nd] vs Ann Li [63rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W L W W W L L
Form
W W W W L L L L W LHead-To-Head: Sharma 1 - 2 Li
They have played 7 sets in total, with Sharma winning 2 and Li winning 5. The last match between Sharma and Li was at the Dow Tennis Classic - Midland, 06-11-2024, First, I.hard with Astra Sharma getting the victory 6-4 4-6 7-6(3).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Astra Sharma | 1 |
| Ann Li | 2 |
| Sharma | Stats | Li |
|---|---|---|
| 58% (14-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 53% (9-8) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 202 | Ranking | 63 |
| 84 | Highest Rank | 44 |
| 29 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 5 |
| 58% (253-181) | Career Total W/L | 60% (239-162) |
| $828,496 | Career Prize Money | $1,350,835 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 4-6 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Astra Sharma
Player
Ann Li
60%
(
65 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
64 of
109)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
35%
(
15 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
44%
(
47 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
108
Total Points Won
109
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Astra Sharma
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Astra Sharma
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 30 | Games Won | 40 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:38:37 | Average Match Time | 1:38:37 |
| 61% (146/238) | 1st Serve % | 58% (124/213) |
| 61% (89/146) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (89/124) |
| 43% (40/92) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (49/89) |
| 50% (8/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (13/34) |
| 35% (75/213) | Return Points Win % | 46% (109/238) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (2/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Astra Sharma vs Ann Li Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sharma 1 - 2 Li
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sharma has won 42.33% of points on their second serve, while Li has won 41.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sharma, in recent form, has won 48.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Li has won 49.78%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.53% and 30.96% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sharma has saved 51.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Li has saved 47.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sharma has won 44.07% of matches played (W/L 26/ 33), with Li winning 63.51% (W/L 47/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sharma has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 96/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 45% (W/L 9/ 11). Li has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 71/ 40), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 7/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Sharma has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 45% of matches (W/L 18/ 22), where as Li has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 68.29% of matches (W/L 28/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Sharma winning 1 times and Li being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Sharma winning 2 and Li winning 5. The last match between Sharma and Li was at the Dow Tennis Classic - Midland, 06-11-2024, First, I.hard with Astra Sharma getting the victory 6-4 4-6 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:37.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sharma and Li have played a deciding set 1 times, with Sharma winning 1 times and Li 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Sharma winning 1, and Li 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sharma has played against opponents with an average rank of 209.41 while Li has played against players with an average rank of 164.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sharma has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Li has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sharma has converted 33.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Li has converted 41.1% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Astra Sharma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alevtina Ibragimova
Player
Astra Sharma
83%
(
5 of
6)
1st Serve %
0%
(
0 of
0)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
60%
(
3 of
5)
1st Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
0)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Rtn Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
4
Total Points Won
2
|
1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Astra Sharma
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve %
69%
(
24 of
35)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
52
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Lia Karatancheva
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
25 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Xinyu Gao
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
11 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
74%
(
59 of
80)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
39%
(
16 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 2-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Astra Sharma
Player
Zhibek Kulambayeva
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Ann Li Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Alexandrova
Player
Ann Li
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
34 of
66)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Anna Blinkova
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taylor Townsend
Player
Ann Li
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
59%
(
49 of
83)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
40 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
86
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Irina-Camelia Begu
Player
Ann Li
53%
(
41 of
77)
1st Serve %
52%
(
44 of
84)
2
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
30 of
44)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eva Lys
Player
Ann Li
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
33 of
69)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Ann Li
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Anna Kalinskaya
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
25%
(
3 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
54
Total Points Won
44
|
7-6(2) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Kimberly Birrell
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
74)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Maria Timofeeva
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ann Li
Player
Daria Saville
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Sharma vs Li?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Sharma Vs Li is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58% (253/181) | Win/Loss | 60% (239/162) |
| 57% (567/434) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (524/393) |
| 53% (4844/4272) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4475/3958) |
| 0.25 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 1102 | Aces Total | 861 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1187 | Total Double Faults | 958 |
| 1:24:28 | Average Match Time | 1:27:52 |
| 403.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 354.68 |
| 61% (15802/25750) | 1st Serve % | 60% (15845/26216) |
| 65% (10247/15802) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (10043/15845) |
| 48% (4815/9948) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (4903/10371) |
| 46% (1425/3078) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (1539/3194) |
| 44% (11602/26512) | Return Points Win % | 45% (11701/25779) |
| 59% (250/424) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (232/391) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 53% (47/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (44/81) |
| 57% (81/143) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (70/118) |
| 84% (242/203) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (222/194) |
| 15% (242/36) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (222/28) |
| 27% (192/52) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (179/45) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
